IMJ
About IMJ
Disclaimer
Contact IMJ
Register as Reviewer
Register As Author
View IMJ Authors
View IMJ Volumes
View Supplement
Issue Archive 1980-1996
Subscription Detail 2010

IMJ Search

 

Advanced Search
 
 
Audit of the Management of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children: The Need for a Uniform Treatment Strategy   Back Bookmark and Share
IMJ
We conducted a two-year prospective audit to review the paediatric management of Convulsive Status Epilepticus (CSE) in Ireland. Our audit showed that there is considerable variability in the management of CSE in this country. In order to provide optimum care for this potentially life-threatening condition a uniform management strategy is required. We propose a protocol for the treatment of CSE, which should ensure uniform management and optimum care and also provide a template for further study and audit of this important disorder.
Y Najam, DG McDonald, M Keegan, DW Webb, JB McMenamin

Abstract

We conducted a two-year prospective audit to review the paediatric management of Convulsive Status Epilepticus (CSE) in Ireland. Our audit showed that there is considerable variability in the management of CSE in this country. In order to provide optimum care for this potentially life-threatening condition a uniform management strategy is required. We propose a protocol for the treatment of CSE, which should ensure uniform management and optimum care and also provide a template for further study and audit of this important disorder.



Introduction
Convulsive Status Epilepticus (CSE) is defined as a continuous convulsion lasting more than 30 minutes or the occurrence of serial convulsions between which there is no recovery of consciousness. Management of this acute condition requires an aggressive uniform therapeutic approach. The British Paediatric Neurology Association has published guidelines for the management of CSE in children 1. However, an informal survey of consultant paediatricians in this country revealed considerable variation in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition. We conducted a two-year prospective audit to review the paediatric management of CSE in Ireland.

Methods
Using an active monthly reporting card system coordinated by the Irish Paediatric Surveillance Unit (IPSU) one hundred and twenty nine participating paediatric consultants working in both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland were asked to notify all cases of CSE. Children with non-convulsive and partial status epilepticus were excluded. Responding consultants were asked to complete a questionnaire to determine the management strategies used in the reported cases.

Results
CSE was reported in eighty-three children over a two-year period from Jan 2000 to Dec 2001. Questionnaires were returned in twenty-two. The results showed that rectal diazepam (19) was the anti-epileptic drug of first choice but there was considerable variation in the use of subsequent antiepileptic drugs when diazepam failed. Intravenous diazepam (9), lorazepam (5) and phenytoin (4) were the preferred second line anti-epileptic agents (Table 1). Phenobarbitone was not used in any patient.

Table 1. Choice of anti-epileptic drugs
1st Line DrugDiazepam (19)
2nd Line drugDiazepam (9)
 Lorazepam (5)
 Phenytoin (4)
 Midazolam (2)
3rd Line drugPhenytoin (7)
 Midazolam (4)
 Lorazepam (1)
 Paraldehyde (1)
4th Line drugParaldehyde (3)
 Midazolam (2)
 Lorazepam (1)
 Phenytoin (1)
5th Line DrugDiazepam (1)
 Midazolam (1)
6th LineMidazolam (1)

Endo-tracheal intubation was required in five cases of which two required thiopentone anaesthesia to achieve seizure control. Most episodes of CSE required 2 to 4 intravenous anti-epileptic drugs to achieve seizure control (Table 2). There was also considerable variation in the dosages of intravenous anti-epileptic drugs used (Table 3). Febrile status was the commonest cause of CSE in this patient population (Table 4).

Table 2. Number of anti-epileptic drugs required to achieve seizure control
1 AED2 (9%)
2 AEDs6 ( 27%)
3 AEDs7 (32 %)
4 AEDs4 (18%)
5 AEDs1 (5%)
6 AEDs2 (9 %)


Table 3. Dosages used to achieve seizure control
 Mode (mg/kg)Range (mg/kg)
Diazepam (p/r)0.500.5--1.1
Diazepam (i/v)0.500.16--0.96
Lorazepam0.100.1--0.2
Phenytoin187.7--23
Midazolam0.200.05--0.2
Paraldehyde200200-500


Table 4. Causes of Convulsive Status Epilepticus
Febrile seizure10 (59%)
Symptomatic epilepsy6 ( 35%)
Known Epilepsy3 (18%)
First Presentation1 (6%)

Discussion
CSE is the commonest paediatric neurological emergency. The exact incidence is unknown but is estimated to be 40-60 per 100,000 children per year. This may often be symptomatic of an acute brain injury (such as meningitis, encephalitis, trauma) or chronic encephalopathy (e.g. brain malformation). However one third of patients with CSE have an idiopathic cause (i.e. new onset epilepsy)2. Febrile CSE is considered to be a separate subgroup of idiopathic origin. Aicardi and Chevrie reported a mortality rate of 11% 3 however more recent studies suggest 2-9 % 4,5, 6. Hauser has estimated mortality attributed to CSE by itself to be no more than 1-2% with complications of CSE accounting for the remainder. CSE is also associated with neurological morbidity ranging from minor neurological impairment to the persistent vegetative state. One study found a morbidity rate of 23% 7. Children had both cognitive and persisting, mainly minor, neurological deficits.

Trends vary in the management of CSE throughout the world but basic principles are the same. Thus, initial management of the patients airway and circulation is critical. The cause of CSE, if present, must be identified and treated. The goal of pharmaco-therapy is to stop the seizure activity as soon as possible. Our study confirms that there is considerable variation in the pharmacological treatment of CSE. It is evident from our study, that administration of a rapidly acting drug such as a benzodiazepine is the initial step in management. There is a marked paucity of data on which anti-epileptic drugs should be given beyond this stage if administration of a benzodiazepine fails to control seizure activity. One study concluded that lorazepam was more effective than phenytoin as a first line therapy but no more efficacious than phenobarbitone or diazepam8. Lorazepam has been suggested as a preferred agent because of its rapid onset of action (1-5 minutes), a prolonged duration of effect (12-18 hours), less respiratory depression and ease of administration. Newer agents including midazolam and phosphenytoin have also been used successfully in CSE.

Our study shows considerable variation in the dosage used of individual AEDs and the need to use 2-4 AEDs in 77% of cases to achieve seizure control. In a survey of 694 members of the Intensive Care Society in the United Kingdom only 12% used a specific protocol for management of CSE in their units 9. As a result of differences in management practices the UK Status Epilepticus Working Party proposed uniform national guidelines for treating CSE 1.


The Neurology Department at Our Ladys Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin has produced and implemented a protocol for the management of CSE since 1998. This protocol, based on the limited clinical data and accepted principles for the management of CSE in children, is similar in principle to the protocol proposed by the UK Status Epilepticus Working Party. We propose that this protocol (Fig 1) be used as standard in our Accident and Emergency Departments where children between the ages of one month to 16 years presenting with CSE are treated. Furthermore, this protocol could form the template for future collaborative studies testing new regimes and therapeutic agents in the management of CSE in children.

Correspondence: JB Mc Menamin,
Neurology Department,
Our Ladys Hospital for Sick Children,
Crumlin, Dublin 12
Email:[email protected]

References:
  1. The status epilepticus working party. The treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. Arch. Dis. Child. 2000: 83, 415-419.
  2. Hauser WA. Status Epilepticus: Epidemiologic Considerations. Neurology 1990;40(Suppl2):9-13.
  3. Aicardi J, Chevrie JJ. Convulsive status epilepticus in infants and children. A study of 239 cases. Epilepsia 1970;11:187-197.
  4. Maytal J, Shinnar S, Moshe SL, Alvarez LA. Low morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus in children. Pediatrics 1989;83(3):323-31.
  5. Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Elveback L. Mortality in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1980; 21: 399-412.
  6. Celesia GG. Prognosis in convulsive status epilepticus. In : Delgado-Escueta AV, Wasterlain CG, Treiman DM, Porter RJ, eds. Status epilepticus : mechanisms of brain damage and treatment. New York : Raven Press, 1983 :55-59. (Advances in neurology; vol.34)
  7. Lacroix J, Deal C, Gauthier M, Rousseau E, Farrell CA. Admissions to a pediatric intensive care unit for status epilepticus: a 10-year experience. Critical Care Medicine 1994;22:827-832.
  8. Treiman DM et al., For the Veterans affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 792-798
  9. Walker MC, Smith SJ, Shorvon SD. The intensive care treatment of status epilepticus in the UK: Results of a national survey and recommendations. Anaesthesia 1995;50:130-135
Author's Correspondence
No Author Comments
Acknowledgement
No Acknowledgement
Other References
No Other References
   
© Copyright 2004 - 2009 Irish Medical Journal